I mean, at a bare minimum if they wanted to be helpful they could've still made the remark while actually attempting to do something that would be helpful. Hypothetically, if they had an understanding then why make their remark at all? Well in either scenario, it's because their priority is not assisting with the issue at hand.
Besides, for somebody with over 2k replies and posts they evidently lack an understanding of the rules behind the forums- otherwise they wouldn't have made the remark that they did. Not useful at all to the nature of the thread, and prioritizing a completely unproductive remark rather than actually focusing on the issue and trying to be helpful.
So, rather than taking a risk and hoping that whoever looks at my thread feels like actually being helpful, I covered up the version number because- as you said- it should have nothing to do with the specific version of forge because it's just a file that is being accessed through the vanilla launcher.Īs a side note to my aforementioned observation (".are more focused on power tripping rather than actually being helpful to the forum"), it's because a lot of them are look at the second reply to my thread. That's great to know, and makes sense! I verified with the most up to date version that my issue persisted throughout the versions of forge before posting but while browsing the forum first for an answer as well as to see how well the moderation is on this forum, it seemed like most moderators and most of the active members are more focused on power tripping rather than actually being helpful to the forum. The question asked here is just allocating memory to the launcher, which is something that is not related to using a specific version of Forge. As an aside, we will typically only lock old versions from their usage (running up the installer or playing the game with it) and development.
0 kommentar(er)
